本文由 taktyk 授权mooool发表，欢迎转发，禁止以mooool编辑版本转载。
Thanks taktyk for authorizing the publication of the project on mooool, Text description provided by taktyk.
taktyk：乍一看，该项目与其他现代设计一样，良好的落地效果、显著而清晰的美感，是一个很了不起了的设计。场地位于布鲁塞尔的 Kapelleveld，这是一座由当时颇具影响力的景观城市学家 Louis van der Swaelmen 设计的合作花园城市。他曾设想在这里建造一个绿道网络，供邻里聚会，并在城市核心地带建造一个社区中心和公园。
taktyk：At first glance this project looks like any contemporary depaving design. It is relatively well executed and deliver a bold and legible aesthetic. That is already something. The site is located in Kapelleveld in Brussels, a cooperative garden city designed by Louis van der Swaelmen, influent landscape urbanist at the time. He had envisioned here a network of green lane where neighbours could meet and a community centre and a park at the core of the city.
▽项目位置Location
然而中央公园一直没有建成，已被一家外籍人士使用的网球俱乐部私有化，而大多数绿道已随着时间的推移被关闭。花园城市变成了一个没有开放空间的地方，三代居民（当地中产阶级、意大利移民以及最近的北非人和东欧人）在这里勉强共存，相互来往。
The central park has never been built and become privatized by a tennis club used by expats whereas most of the green lanes have been closed across time. The garden city became a place without accessible open space where three generations of inhabitants (local middle class, Italian migrants, and lately north African and east Europeans) barely co-exist, engage with each other’s.
景观设计能否支持集体努力，真正打破我们所知的人与人之间的精神和物理边界？Can landscape architecture support collective endeavours, literally crack the mental and physical borders that we acknowledged between humans?
该项目通过激活一块废弃的网球场地，重新恢复了毗邻社区中心的核心区域。我们剖开地面，露出“裂缝”，重新让自然中的生命周期和共同建造过程出现在该区域。“裂缝”朝向一个坚硬的边缘，我们将其打开，使之与山谷系统连接起来。这就是我们的初衷，然而这种倡导在花园城市中建造花园的方式引发了争论、对话以及紧张的关系。最终我们明白，一名设计师的职责不在于解决问题，而在于揭示现有的紧张关系。
Our project reclaims the central core of the site adjacent to the community centre by activating a left-over tennis plot. Uncovering its ground bring life cycles and co construction processes back. The “crack” points toward a hard edge that we open to connect to the valley system. That were our initial intentions, this tactical approach advocating to create a garden in a garden city generated debates, conversations but as well tensions. In the end we understand that our role as designers, was not to solve but to reveal the existing tensions at stake.
旧的网球场早已不再被集体使用，“55”社区住宅和花园城市的居民正在对其进行重新干预。场地上到处都是由回收材料创作的“社会雕塑”，该词借用自艺术家 Joseph Beuys，阐述了从空间体验中诞生的城市实践原则：重要的不是项目的结果，而是项目的参与过程。那么共同参与的结果能被称为艺术作品吗？Beuys 认为，艺术家可以是任何个人。艺术激发的是一种能够聚集和形成社会的集体暗示。从那时起，行为本身，即“做”（此处指“用……做”）的这种行为，就成为了作品。
The former tennis court, long withdrawn from collective use, is being reinvested by the “55”, a community house and the inhabitants of the garden city. It is populated of curiosities, social sculptures co-created from as found materials. The term social sculpture, borrowed from artist Joseph Beuys, sets out the principles of the urban practice born of the experience of spaces: what matters is less the result of a project than the participatory process leading to it. Can the result be called a work of art? According to Beuys, is artist any individual. Art stimulates a collective implication capable of gathering and forging a society. From then on, the act itself, the “doing”, (here «to make with”), becomes the work.
黄色呼应了场地原有的运动属性，也在色调上与如同彩绘或刺绣般的干预措施之间取得了联系。在网球场上，红色的沥青和白色的线条划定了游戏区域，如今，这些线条被一条斜向的 “裂缝”切开，释放出肥沃的土壤。裂缝中点缀着黄色的花圃和儿童行走的原木，“裂缝”逐渐扩大，绕过一个供人休憩的地方，然后穿透高高的树篱，引导人们进一步探索，并沿着 Woluwe 山谷前行。我们在树篱上打开了一个洞，洞后是一个非常有趣的第三空间，通向一个未知的城市网络……
The evocation of the pre-existing sports function is present by the yellow colour, chromatic link between the interventions which include painted elements or embroideries. From the tennis court, the red asphalt and the white lines delimiting the game zone that today are cut by a diagonal “crack” that frees the fertile soil. Dotted with yellow flowering plantations and logs for the children’s path, it gradually swells, circles a place to sit and then pierces the high hedge to incite to venture further, to go down the Woluwe valley. We have literally opened a hole within a hedge, behind it a very intriguing third space leads to a possible metropolitan network, the “owner” of the site has decided to place there a new gate ….
项目名称：The crack, making sense of gardening in a garden city today
项目地点：比利时 Av. Albert Dumont 10, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert
设计年份：2018
完成年份：2021
预算：24万欧元
设计师：taktyk+Alive Architecture
图片：SLRB_BGHM
Name of the project: The crack, making sense of gardening in a garden city today
Location: Av. Albert Dumont 10, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium
Design year: 2018
Year Completed: 2021
Budget: 240 000 euros
Designer: taktyk+ Alive Architecture
image credits: SLRB_BGHM
“ 微观的干预措施将一个令人愉悦的提议落地实施，让一些活跃的居民摆脱了惰性，开始行动起来，共同建设城市中的花园。”
审稿编辑: SIM
更多 Read more about: taktyk+Alive Architecture
0 Comments